Miscellaneous · Q1: is skew symmetric
If A and B are symmetric matrices, prove that AB – BA is a skew symmetric matrix.
Let and be symmetric matrices of order . Then , , and is a square matrix of order .
Using and ,
is a skew symmetric matrix. Hence proved.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
Transposing a product reverses the order: . For symmetric matrices the primes disappear, so and . Transposing therefore just swaps its two terms, which turns it into , its own negative. A matrix whose transpose is its negative is, by definition, skew symmetric.
- Given
- and . Symmetric matrices are square by definition, and for to make sense, A and B must be square of the same order, say .
- To show
- .
- Plan
- (1) Check the orders, so that every matrix in the problem exists. (2) Transpose the difference term by term. (3) Use the product rule on each term. (4) Replace , by , and compare with . (5) Check with numbers.
Basics you need
is A with its rows written as columns: the entry of is the entry of A. An matrix has an transpose. Basics: reading a table sideways; mirror patterns
, , and the reversal rule . Together the first two give . Lesson: transpose
A square matrix is symmetric if and skew symmetric if . Lesson: symmetric and skew symmetric matrices
is defined when the number of columns of X equals the number of rows of Y. In general . Basics: pair up, multiply, add
Solution
Check that every matrix in the problem exists
A symmetric matrix must be square (Definition 4 is stated for square matrices). Let A and B both be . Then:
- : , columns of A rows of B, so it is defined and is .
- : defined in the same way, also .
- : a difference of two matrices, so it is defined and is .
So is a square matrix, which is what a skew symmetric matrix has to be.
The question does not say "of the same order", but it has to be meant. If A were and B were , the product would not exist at all and there would be nothing to prove. Checking orders first also confirms that C is square, which Definition 5 requires before we may call it skew symmetric.Product rule for orders: gives . Sums and differences need equal orders. Basics: pair up, multiply, addTranspose the difference term by term
Let . The transpose of a difference is the difference of the transposes:
This comes from two listed rules: and . Writing and applying both gives . Transposing just moves every entry to its mirror position, and subtracting entry by entry commutes with that move.Properties (iii) and (ii) of Section 3.5.1. Lesson: transposeReverse each product
Use on each term: with in the first and in the second.
The order reverses because the entry of is row of X times column of Y. After transposing, that number sits at position , and it equals row of (which is column of Y) times column of (which is row of X). That is the entry of , with Y first.Property (iv) of Section 3.5.1: . Lesson: transposeUse the symmetry of A and B
Since and , replace each primed letter:
So , and C is square (Step 1). By Definition 5, is skew symmetric.
The third line just takes out the factor : , because matrix addition is commutative and entry by entry. Notice what the proof did not use: we never assumed . In fact if then , which is skew symmetric for a trivial reason. The interesting case is , and the proof covers it.Definitions 4 and 5 (Section 3.6): means symmetric, means skew symmetric. Lesson: symmetric and skew symmetric matricesWhat this says about the entries
Every skew symmetric matrix has zeros on its diagonal: putting in gives , so and . So for any symmetric A and B of the same order, every diagonal entry of is 0, and the entries across the diagonal are negatives of each other.
This gives a quick way to spot an arithmetic slip when you compute for actual matrices: if a diagonal entry is not 0, something has gone wrong. We use exactly this in the check below.The remark after Definition 5 (Section 3.6): the diagonal of a skew symmetric matrix is zero. Basics: mirror patterns
For symmetric A and B of the same order, . Hence is skew symmetric. (Proofs have no entry in the answer key.)
Take the symmetric matrices
Each entry of is a row of A times a column of B:
and each entry of is a row of B times a column of A:
Notice is exactly the transpose of , as Step 3 predicts. Subtracting entry by entry,
which has a zero diagonal and across it: skew symmetric ✓. The verification script also tests 300 random pairs of symmetric matrices of orders 1 to 5.
- Writing without reversing the order. That gives , and you would wrongly "prove" C is symmetric.
- Assuming . Matrix products usually do not commute; if they did here, C would simply be O.
- Checking only one example and calling it a proof. A numerical example can illustrate or refute a general claim, but cannot prove it; the proof must use arbitrary symmetric A and B.
- Forgetting the orders. A and B must be square of the same order, or AB – BA does not exist.
- To decide whether a matrix expression is symmetric or skew symmetric, transpose it with the rules and compare with the original.
- For symmetric A and B, : transposing swaps the order of the factors. So is symmetric and is skew symmetric.
- The same fact appears as the MCQ Exercise 3.3 Q11, and its cousin "AB is symmetric if and only if " is Example 24.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Orders of products and sums | Step 1 | Sections 3.4.1 and 3.4.5 (Lesson: matrix multiplication) |
| , , | Steps 2, 3 | Section 3.5.1, properties (ii), (iii), (iv) (Lesson: transpose) |
| Symmetric: ; skew symmetric: ; both defined for square matrices | Steps 1, 4 | Definitions 4 and 5, Section 3.6 (Lesson: symmetric and skew symmetric) |
| Diagonal of a skew symmetric matrix is zero | Step 5, Check | Remark after Definition 5, Section 3.6 |
| Commutativity of matrix addition | Step 4 | Section 3.4.3 |
| All matrices in the check; random tests | Check | Recomputed with sympy in the site's verification script |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →