Exercise 10.4 · Q7: Distributive law
Let the vectors be given as , , . Then show that .
Similarly,
Now . So
Opening the brackets and grouping the terms and the terms,
. Hence proved.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
Every component of is a difference of two products, each with one factor from . Replacing by and multiplying out splits each component into a " part" plus a " part". Collecting the parts gives ; collecting the parts gives .
- Given
- , , .
- To show
- .
- Plan
- (1) Write and in components. (2) Write and in components. (3) Multiply out and regroup. (4) Compare, and check with numbers.
Basics you need
, the expansion of the determinant with on top (Section 10.6.3). Basics: a determinant measures a signed area
(Section 10.5.1). Lesson: components
, and terms can be added in any order. Basics: expanding brackets
Solution
and in components
These are the determinant formula with , then , in the bottom row. The second line is the first with every replaced by .The determinant form of the vector product (Section 10.6.3). Lesson: the cross productin components
The components of are , , , so they form the bottom row:
The same formula as in Step 1, with in place of , and so on. Brackets keep each sum together.Adding vectors in components (Section 10.5.1). Lesson: componentsMultiply out and regroup
Take the component:
In the same way, the bracket is and the bracket is .
Each bracket is opened by , and then the four terms are put in a different order: the two with a first, the two with a second. The minus sign in front of the bracket applies to both groups, so it stays in front of each.Distributive law for numbers; rearranging a sum. Basics: expanding bracketsCompare with Step 1
The first square bracket is exactly from Step 1 and the second is exactly . Since the components agree one by one, the vectors are equal. This is Property 3 (i) of Section 10.6.3, proved here from the component formula. (The book itself obtains the determinant formula, just before Example 22, by expanding the brackets with this law; so within the book the exercise shows that the formula and the law agree, and with the determinant formula taken as the starting point it is a complete proof.)Vectors are equal iff their components are equal (Section 10.5.1). Lesson: the cross product, exercisesCheck with numbers
Take , , . Then , and
And .
A numerical example cannot prove a general law, but it is a quick test that the algebra above has no slip; the general proof is Steps 1 to 4.The determinant form of the vector product (Section 10.6.3). Basics: a determinant measures a signed area
for all vectors . Hence proved.
(Textbook answer: the answer key has no entry for this "show that" question.)
With the sample of Step 5, component by component: : ; : ; : .
A second sample, , , : , and , the same vector.
- Proving it with one numerical example. A sample only checks; the proof must use general components .
- Dropping the minus sign in front of the bracket. It belongs to both and .
- Using the law to prove itself. Writing " by distributivity" assumes what is to be shown; the components do the work.
- Each component of is linear in the components of , so sums in split.
- To prove a vector identity in components, compare the , , parts one at a time.
- Check a general identity on a numerical sample before trusting the algebra.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| as a determinant in components | Steps 1, 2, 5 | Section 10.6.3 (Basics: a determinant measures a signed area) |
| Sum of vectors in components; equal vectors have equal components | Steps 2, 4 | Section 10.5.1 (Lesson: components) |
| for numbers | Step 3 | Algebra (Basics: expanding brackets) |
| Distributivity of the vector product (the statement proved) | Step 4 | Section 10.6.3, Property 3 (i) (Lesson: the cross product) |
| , | Check | Section 10.6.3, Observations 4 and 7 |
| The question | Result | Exercise 10.4 Q7 (no answer-key entry) (Lesson: the cross product, exercises) |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →